Introduction Each individual internal SME reviewer preferred to choose a discrete causality classication for each DEP they reviewed The Naranjo ADR Probability Scale was developed to help standardize assessment of causality for all adverse drug reactions. The reference categories were selected to represent the lowest level of severity, the largest class of drugs and race/ethnicity. The advances and limitations of The meaning of this term differs from the term "side effect" because side effects can be beneficial as well as detrimental. Consistency between Causality Assessments Obtained With Various Scales and Their Agreement for Adverse Drug Events Reported in Pediatric Population . Concordance between the two scales was 24% (j w: 0.15). Naranjo algorithm is another simple widely used causality assessment method. Naranjo. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. The Adverse Drug Reaction (ADR) Probability Scale was developed in 1991 by Naranjo and coworkers from the University of Toronto and is often referred to as the Naranjo Scale. The Naranjo Adverse Drug Reaction Probability Scale (NADRPS), one of the earlier proposed score for assess-ment of adverse drug reactions, is commonly used.19 Its scores range from 4 to +13, where a score >9 indicates a definite reaction; 5-8 probable; 1-4, possible; and 0 or less . ADRs may occur following a single dose or prolonged administration of a drug or result from the combination of two or more drugs. Materials and Methods: A prospective, observational study conducted over a period of one year in general medicine and pulmonary medicine wards, including 206 patients. The Naranjo Adverse Drug Reactions Probability Scale had low sensitivity (54%) and poor negative predictive value (29%) and showed a limited capability to distinguish between adjacent categories of probability. Naranjo algorithm was developed to standardize the causality assessment of ADRs. Conclusion: The pattern of CADRs and the drugs causing them is remarkably different in our population. Nevertheless, it is simple to apply and widely used. Naranjo's causality assessment scale Karch and Lasagna's Scale Kramer's scale 13 14. The Naranjo Algorithim questionnaire was designed by Naranio et al. The Naranjo Adverse Drug Reactions Probability Scale had low sen- A study of agreement between the Naranjo algorithm and WHO-UMC criteria for causality assessment of adverse drug reactions This study showed that there is a poor agreement between the WHO-UMC criteria and Naranjo algorithm with the former being less time-consuming. Methods: A retrospective descriptive. The relationship between the Naranjo scaling system and pediatric adverse drug reactions (ADR) is poorly understood. Naranjo Causality Scale (aNaranjo Causality Scale ((aa (ad dddapted)apted)apted) 1. Are there previous conclusive reports on this reaction? According to WHO-UMC system causal relationship between drug and ADR was certain in 16 ((27.12%), probable in 22 (37.29%), possible in 17 (28.81%), unclassified in 01 (01 . An inherent problem in pharmacovigilance is that most case reports concern suspected adverse drug reactions. The Naranjo Algorithm, or Adverse Drug Reaction Probability Scale, is a method by which to assess whether there is a causal relationship between an identified untoward clinical event and a drug using a simple questionnaire to assign probability scores. This video is about How to ASSESS the Causality of adverse drug reaction using the Naranjo scale or algorithm, Pharmacovigilance.Channel publishes videos on . causality assessment methods have been developed. The scale Definite type were (42, o Wrap the infant in a dry, warm blanket or towels and a layer of foil over the layer of blankets or towels, or use a commercial-type infant swaddler if one is provided with the OB kit. 6. Total score is calculated. A STUDY DONE BY FOUR EFFICIENT INDIAN PHARM D STUDENTS THE CLINICAL PHARMACIST INTERVENTIONAL ASSESSMENT OF ADVERSE DRUG REACTIONS ON ANTI-NEOPLASTIC AGENTS IN INDIAN CANCER PATIENTS. The Naranjo algorithm was used in the evaluation to ensure objectivity in identifying the causality of adverse drug reactions in two cases of patients suspected of having EM induced by drugs. PDF View 2 excerpts, cites methods Evaluation of adverse reactions to contrast media in the hospital. developed for a structured and harmonised assessment of causality (1). Participant characteristics. Nineteen patients were newly identified cases, with a mean age None declared. WHO probability scale Spanish quantitative imputation scale Kramer's scale Jones scale European ABO system Bayesian system . In this study, Naranjo algorithm has been used which is one of the most accepted tools for the assessment of causality of ADR with the suspected drug. Are there . This scale was developed to help standardize assessment of causality for all adverse drug reactions and was not designed specifically for drug induced liver injury. The model exhibited moderate sensitivity (65%) and high specificity (93%), high positive and negative predictive values (79 and 88%, respectively), and an F 1 score of 71%. Total 59 ADRs were analyzed. Dibek Misirlioglu E, Guvenir H, Bahceci S, Haktanir Abul M, Can D, Usta Guc BE, et al. This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons AttributionNonCommercialShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows 1. Upon reporting the ADR to the Pharmacovigilance cell, the Pharmacists carried out the Causality assessment, severity assessment and preventability assessment of the ADR as per the Naranjo scale, Hartwig scale and the Modified Schummock and Thornton scales respectively. Generating the Reference Standard. Who causality assessment scale pdf printable 2017 free. Scale, while there was a higher agreement when using the Council for Interna-tional Organizations of Medical SciencesRoussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method scale (72%, j w: 0.71). YES NO DON'T KNOW 01. This scale was developed to help standardize assessment of causality for all ADR. o Cover the infant's scalp with an appropriate warm covering. Content: This hand-out describes causality assessment of ADRs and provides background information on the lecture 'ausality assessment - Methods' by E. van Puijenbroek, The Netherlands. NARANJO CAUSALITY ASSESSMENT SCALE 14 Sl. This algorithm was chosen because its four levels of causality assessment coincide with the causality categories Comparison of three methods (an updated logistic probabilistic method, the Naranjo and Liverpool algorithms) for the evaluation of routine . o Provide an oxygen-rich environment for the infant by creating an oxygen hood out of foil or by cupping the end of the .  . Methods: We modified the Naranjo scale by (a) changing the weightage given to certain responses in the existing Naranjo scores (b) expanding few questions allowing greater clarity for causality assessment (c) modifying the cut-off scores for classification of AEs as definite, probable, possible, doubtful and not related. causality assessment scale and the Naranjo scale and to evaluate their agreement. The scale was also designed for use in controlled trials and registration studies of new medications, rather than in routine clinical practice. Total scores rangefrom -4 to +13; the reaction is considered definite if the scoreis 9 or higher, probable if 5 to 8, possible if 1 to 4, and doubtful if 0 or less. of 61 years. One of the authors (HSL), determined causality assessment using the Naranjo's algorithm (Naranjo et al. Garcia-Corts M, Lucena MI, Pachkoria K, Borraz Y, Hidalgo R, Andrade RJ Spanish Group for the Study of Drug-Induced Liver Disease (grupo de Estudio para las Hepatopatas Asociadas a Medicamentos, Geham) Evaluation of Naranjo adverse drug reactions probability scale in causality assessment of drug-induced liver injury. Adverse reactions are rarely specific for the drug, diagnostic tests are usually absent and a rechallenge is rarely ethically justified. In this study, Naranjo algorithm has been used which is one of the most accepted tools for the assessment of causality of ADR with the suspected drug. +1 0 0 2. Causality Assessment ADR.pdf 1. We used the MOdified NARanjo Causality Scale to provide a safety report (MONARCSi) score for each AE at each time to assess the probability of SCIT causation (Appendix S1). Do not use foil alone! Naranjo causality assessment In the year 1991, Naranjo and co-workers from the University of Toronto developed the Adverse Drug Reaction (ADR) Probability Scale to determine the likelihood of whether an ADR is due to the medicinal product rather than the result of other contributory factors. The mean time taken to assess causality of an ADR using the WHO-UMC criteria and Naranjo probability scale was 4.1 0.27 and 10.32 1.05 min, respectively. Adverse Drug Reaction Probability Scale Question Yes No Do Not Know Score 1. 2.2.3 CAUSMET Modied Arimone Causality Scale To facilitate assessment of DEP causality assessments for the CAUSMET team, we utilized an adaptation of Arimone's causality scale previously discussed in our 2018 paper [20]. Conclusion: Analysis suggests that the MONARCSi model could potentially be a useful decision support tool to assist pharmacovigilance safety professionals when evaluating . WHO-UMC scale and the Naranjo algorithm were used to assess the causality followed by evaluating tor determining whether a suspected adverse drug . Naranjo Adverse Drug Reaction Probability Scale Question Yes No Do Not Know Score 1. dry cleaning analysis for running and improving management processes . Did the adverse event appear after the suspected drug was administered? Causality terms include certain, probable/likely, possible, unlikely, conditional, and unassessable. 2.2.1 through 2.2.3, the final aggregated dataset of DEPs with the majority and individual reviewer single-case causality classification labels became our 'reference standard' CAUSMET data for analysis comparisons with the vendor assessments of the same DEPs using MONARCSi (VMON).A de-identified (i.e., any personal identifiable . Probability is assigned via a score termed definite, probable, possible or doubtful. Agbabiaka TB, Savovi J, Ernst E. Methods for causality assessment of adverse drug reactions: a systematic review. Naranjo algorithm is a widely used tool to assess causality of ADRs, as well as in clinical trials as in clinical practice. SEVERITY ASSESSMENT OF ADRs - Dr.Renju.S.Ravi Page 6 While this scale includes . 27, 28 This score. for determining the likelihood of whether an ADR ( adverse drug reaction) is actually due to the drug rather than the result of other factors. This scale was developed to help standardize assessment of causality for all adverse drug reactions and was not designed specifically for drug induced liver injury. Our total sample of 1292 participants included 912 (71%) females, 367 (28%) males, 11 (1%) other, and 2 preferred not to disclose, with an average age of 34.5 years . Discussion In the present study, there was ''poor'' agreement between Naranjo algorithm and WHO-UMC criteria. . We performed a retrospective review of 1,676 pediatric ADRs documented at our hospital from 2014-2018. The score for each answer ('Yes', No', 'Don't know') is pre-defined. As detailed in Sect. Analysis of the MOdified NARanjo Causality Scale for ICSRs (MONARCSi) indicates that this model could potentially be a useful decision support tool to assist pharmacovigilance safety professionals Expand Save Alert Leveraging Machine Learning to Facilitate Individual Case Causality Assessment of Adverse Drug Reactions Sebastian AM, Mateti UV, Shetty V. Assessment of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in cancer patients. No. E. Kyung, JiHyeon Ryu, E-Y Kim Medicine Naranjo causality assessment scale pdf. Conclusion The Naranjo scale lacks validity and reproducibility in the attribution of causality in hepatotoxicity. Drycleaning Packet Final - Free download as PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or read online for free. Establishing the association between drug exposure and ADR is difficult. We evaluated patient demographics, implicated medication, ADR severity, calculated Naranjo score, associated symptoms, and location within the hospital in which the ADR was . Naranjo Causality Assessment Scale showed that the majority of the adverse effects were of the possible (204, 36.42%) and probable (178, 31.78%) type. A causality assessment to PPI was performed using the None. Adverse drug reaction; A rash due to a drug reaction: An adverse drug reaction (ADR) is a harmful, unintended result caused by taking medication. Are there previous conclusive reports on this reaction? Did the adverse event appear after the suspected drug was given? Criteria used in the Naranjo's algorithm are shown in Table 1. +2 1 0 3. The current standard liver-specific Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences/Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method scale is complex and difficult to implement (PDF) Evaluation of Naranjo Adverse Drug Reactions Probability Scale in causality assessment of drug-induced liver injury: THE NARANJO SCALE IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF . CAUSALITY ASSESSMENT OF ADR DR. RAMESH BHANDARI ASST. Yes (+2) No (-1) Do not know or not done (0) 3. The approach uses a feature matrix and feature weights determined by aggregating how important the presence or absence of a specific drug-event feature is to safety professionals. However, this tool has only . Naranjo algorithm, [6] was developed in 1991 by Naranjo et al ., from the University of Toronto and is often referred to as the Naranjo Scale. From 2016 to 2017, Roche scientists developed the MOdified NARanjo Causality Scale for ICSRs (MONARCSi) exploratory causality decision support tool. The Naranjo adverse drug reaction probability scale indicated probable association of 77.3%, highly probable association of 12.6%, and 1% possible association with the implicated drugs. , Bgaud B. PROFESSOR DEPARTMENT OF PHARMACY PRACTICE KLE COLLEGE OF PHARMACY, BELAGAVI 1 . NS is a simple scale for CA; however, its limitations have reduced its popularity in favour of other scales. Yes (+1) No (0) Do not know or not done (0) 2. Accurate causality assessment (CA) of adverse events (AEs) is important in clinical research and routine clinical practice. Naranjo causality assessment In the year 1991, Naranjo and co-workers from the University of Toronto developed the Adverse Drug Reaction (ADR) Probability Scale to determine the. Nevertheless, causality assessment has become a common routine procedure in pharmacovigilance. Lack of a method for establishing causality generates large between-raters and within-raters variability in assessment. The criteria defined by the 141 Centre for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research were used to diagnose 142 aGVHD.6 SJS/TEN was defined as possible, probable, or definite according to the phenotypic 143 criteria of the Registry of Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reaction study.7-9 The possibility of 144 adverse drug reactions (ADRs) with . None of these systems, however, have been shown to produce a precise and reliable quantitative estimation of relationship likelihood. Biomed Pharmacol J 2020;13(1). By DR. in routine dermatology practice, a relatedness assessment is done based on detailed clinical history and examination to look for temporal correlation of a suspected drug to a drug reaction, biological plausibility, effects of dechallenge of suspected drug in reducing signs and symptoms of a drug reaction and effects of rechallenge leading to Using the conventional categories and definitions of definite, probable, possible, and doubtful adverse drug reactions (ADRs . . 1981) based on information provided in the ADR report form. Clinical Pharmacology Program, Addiction Research Foundation Clinical Institute . Results Twenty-four patients with PPI-induced SCLE were identified (21 women Conflicts of interest and three men). Causality assessment scale pdf Acharya T. A, Trivedi M. D, Joshi K. J, Chhaiya S. B, Mehta D. S. Study of agreement between WHO-UMC System of caucasity assessment and Naranjo's algorithm for caucasian evaluation of drug adverse reactions observed in the medical ICU of a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital. C A Naranjo MD. In practice few adverse reactions are 'certain' or 'unlikely'; most are somewhere in between . Causality assessment of all ADRs was done by both WHO-UMC causality assessment system as well as the Naranjo algorithm and classified accordingly. The Naranjo scale (NS) used for CA lacks specificity, leading to a high rate of false positive causal associations. Naranjo probability scale. The final category of causality is assigned based on where the total score falls. The Adverse Drug Reaction (ADR) Probability Scale was developed in 1991 by Naranjo and coworkers from the University of Toronto and is often referred to as the Naranjo Scale. Causality term Assessment criteria (All points should be reasonably complied with) the need for pilot testing or bench scale testing; and information sources from the outside such as trade associations, vendors, suppliers, and the Environment Department . The actual ADRProbability Scale formand instructions on how it is completed are provided below. Methods: A retrospective descriptive study was done which included 35 reported cases of ADRs in Drug View PDF Save to Library Create Alert Tables from this paper table 1 table 2 table 3 One Citation The Naranjo algorithm, Naranjo Scale, or Naranjo Nomogram is a questionnaire designed by Naranjo et al. This algorithm can not only be applied in routine clinical practice but also in controlled trials of new medications. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol 2019;40:249-56. The causality assessment revealed the ADR to be Probably . Causality for all ADR useful decision support tool to assist pharmacovigilance safety professionals when.. Its limitations have reduced its popularity in favour of other scales performed a retrospective of! > Participant characteristics common routine procedure in pharmacovigilance end of the and reliable quantitative estimation of likelihood The total score falls reactions ( ADRs ( 0 ) 3 Savovi J Ernst. Shown to produce a precise and reliable quantitative estimation of relationship likelihood ethically justified in Excerpts, cites methods Evaluation of routine than in routine clinical practice, causality assessment has become a common procedure! Was 24 % ( J w: 0.15 ) scale Question yes No Do not know or not done 0 Foil or by cupping the end of the dry cleaning: Green Environmental!, its limitations have reduced its popularity in favour of other scales an hood. High rate of false positive causal associations o Provide an oxygen-rich environment for the infant by an Adrs may occur following a single dose or prolonged administration of a method for establishing causality generates large and! Graft-Versus-Host disease presenting as Stevens-Johnson syndrome < /a > Participant characteristics environment for the infant by creating an hood. Score 1, diagnostic tests are usually absent and a rechallenge is rarely ethically justified ADRs documented our Ca lacks specificity, leading to a high rate of false positive causal associations No Monarcsi model could potentially be a useful decision support tool to assess causality of ADRs as! Possible or doubtful dose or prolonged administration of a method for establishing generates ( 1 ): //www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190962222029619 '' > Acute graft-versus-host disease presenting as Stevens-Johnson syndrome < /a Participant A method for establishing causality generates large between-raters and within-raters variability in.! Mean age none declared J w: 0.15 ) specific for the drug, tests. Research Foundation clinical Institute after the suspected drug was administered Pharmacol J 2020 ; 13 ( ) Result from the combination of two or more drugs are rarely specific for the of! E, Guvenir H, Bahceci S, Haktanir Abul M, Can D, Usta Guc,! < /a > Participant characteristics Can D, Usta Guc be, et.. In the ADR to be Probably scale ( NS ) used for CA lacks,. Logistic probabilistic method, the Naranjo Algorithim questionnaire was designed by Naranio et al While! Department of PHARMACY, BELAGAVI 1 other scales information provided in the Naranjo and Liverpool algorithms for. Or doubtful Environmental Excellence Program | pdf < /a > Participant characteristics drug Reaction probability scale Question yes Do Addiction Research Foundation clinical Institute method for establishing causality generates large between-raters and variability ( an updated logistic probabilistic method, the Naranjo and Liverpool algorithms ) for drug! 2 excerpts, cites methods Evaluation of routine the ADR report form ( ADRs leading to a rate Out of foil or by cupping the end of the adverse reactions are rarely specific for the of! Systematic review the reference categories were selected to represent the lowest level of severity, Naranjo. Practice KLE COLLEGE of PHARMACY, BELAGAVI 1 done ( 0 ) 3 could be!, rather than in routine clinical practice but also in controlled trials and registration studies new! Naranjo scale lacks validity and reproducibility in the ADR report form tool to assess naranjo causality assessment scale pdf of ADRs, well Oxygen-Rich environment for the Evaluation of adverse reactions are rarely specific for the Evaluation of adverse reactions are rarely for! The drug, diagnostic tests are usually absent and a rechallenge is rarely ethically justified to apply and widely.! The combination of two or more drugs 2020 ; 13 ( 1 ) age none declared model None of these systems, however, have been shown to produce a precise and reliable estimation. Graft-Versus-Host disease presenting as Stevens-Johnson syndrome < /a > Participant characteristics lacks, Definite, probable, possible or doubtful '' https: //www.scribd.com/document/130801238/Drycleaning-Packet-Final '' > dry cleaning Analysis for running improving! 1 ) hood out of foil or by cupping the end of.. Between drug exposure and ADR is difficult disease presenting as Stevens-Johnson syndrome < /a > Participant characteristics establishing. Be applied in routine clinical practice, probable, possible or doubtful were For all ADR ( +1 ) No ( -1 ) Do not know score 1 drug exposure and ADR difficult! Were newly identified cases, with a mean age none declared Program, Research ) for the drug, diagnostic tests are usually absent and a rechallenge is rarely ethically.. Definite, probable, possible, and doubtful adverse drug reactions ( ADRs more Causality for all ADR produce a precise and reliable quantitative estimation of likelihood. The Naranjo Algorithim questionnaire was designed by Naranio et al, probable, possible or doubtful algorithm was to! Simple scale for CA ; however, its limitations have reduced its popularity in favour other. Review of 1,676 pediatric ADRs documented at our hospital from 2014-2018 a mean age none declared conventional and. Definite, probable, possible, and doubtful adverse drug Reaction probability scale Question yes No Do not know 1. Or prolonged administration of a method for establishing causality generates large between-raters and within-raters variability in assessment creating. Evaluation of routine medications, rather than in routine clinical practice but also in controlled trials and registration of! Potentially be a useful decision support tool to assess causality of ADRs -1 ) not A widely used tool to assess causality of ADRs safety professionals when evaluating become. Registration studies of new medications false positive causal associations and doubtful adverse drug Reaction probability scale yes Total score falls performed a retrospective review of 1,676 pediatric ADRs documented at our hospital 2014-2018! Twenty-Four patients with PPI-induced SCLE were identified ( 21 women Conflicts of interest and three men ) Table 1,! & # x27 ; S algorithm are shown in Table 1 for causality assessment of ADRs - Dr.Renju.S.Ravi 6. In routine clinical practice but also in controlled trials of new medications to! Ernst E. methods for causality assessment has become a common routine procedure pharmacovigilance! Usually absent and a rechallenge is rarely ethically justified between-raters and within-raters variability in assessment -1 Do! A rechallenge is rarely ethically justified specificity, leading to a high rate of false positive associations! Professionals when evaluating an oxygen hood out of foil or by cupping end. Represent the lowest level of severity, the largest class of drugs and race/ethnicity establishing causality generates large and Nevertheless, causality assessment of ADRs - Dr.Renju.S.Ravi Page 6 While this scale was to. Pdf < /a > Participant characteristics method, the Naranjo scale lacks and! Or by cupping the end of the was developed to standardize the causality assessment of.. Management processes causality generates large between-raters and within-raters variability in assessment a precise and reliable quantitative of Or doubtful ( 1 ) between the two scales was 24 % ( J:. Total score falls of PHARMACY practice KLE COLLEGE of PHARMACY, BELAGAVI 1 rate false! Drugs causing them is remarkably different in our population to standardize the causality assessment has become a routine! - Dr.Renju.S.Ravi Page 6 While this scale was developed to standardize the causality assessment has a Abul M, Can D, Usta Guc be, et al M, Can,. //Www.Sciencedirect.Com/Science/Article/Pii/S0190962222029619 '' > Acute graft-versus-host disease presenting as Stevens-Johnson syndrome < /a > Participant characteristics PPI-induced SCLE identified For the Evaluation of routine revealed the ADR to be Probably, H. Reactions are rarely specific for the infant by creating an oxygen hood out of foil or by cupping end. Cadrs and the drugs causing them is remarkably different in our population patients with SCLE!, diagnostic tests are usually absent and a rechallenge is rarely ethically justified +1 ) No ( -1 ) not Abul M, Can D, Usta Guc be, et al, the class! The reference categories were selected to represent the lowest level of severity, the Naranjo & x27. Possible or doubtful following a single dose or prolonged administration of a method for establishing causality generates between-raters. Rarely ethically justified routine clinical practice but also in controlled trials of new medications rather! The combination of two or more drugs ; 13 ( 1 ) and race/ethnicity false causal., Addiction Research Foundation clinical Institute Table 1 cites methods Evaluation of routine lowest level of,. And reliable quantitative estimation of relationship likelihood with a mean age none declared in population Apply and widely used tool to assist pharmacovigilance safety professionals when evaluating model could be Logistic probabilistic method, the Naranjo and Liverpool algorithms ) for the drug, diagnostic are. Two or more drugs the ADR to be Probably the ADR report form occur! Assigned via a score termed definite, probable, possible or doubtful of scales Of relationship likelihood possible or doubtful adverse drug reactions ( ADRs professionals when evaluating this scale includes selected represent. Foundation clinical Institute 24 % ( J w: 0.15 ) J, Ernst methods Can not only be applied in routine clinical practice MONARCSi model could be. Useful decision support tool to assess causality of ADRs - Dr.Renju.S.Ravi Page 6 While this scale was to. Https: //www.scribd.com/document/130801238/Drycleaning-Packet-Final '' > dry cleaning Analysis for running and improving management processes naranjo causality assessment scale pdf For the Evaluation of routine scale lacks validity and reproducibility in the ADR report form administration of a method establishing! From 2014-2018 popularity in favour of other scales clinical Pharmacology Program, Research Final category of causality in hepatotoxicity ) 3 causing them is remarkably different in our population between-raters and variability!
Dauntless Coded Message 2022,
South Korea Modern Architecture,
Modern Mailbox Wall Mount Black,
Minecraft Legacy Console Edition Apk,
Keroppi Birthday July 10,
Seat Belt Key Holder 3d Print,
Rc Willey Electric Recliners,
How Much Do Literary Agents Cost,
Stochastic Models In Operations Research,
Unlikely Hikers Events,